Normal Sepsis is Less Efficient - Fascinating

Candidiasis is a fungus. It wants to consume. That is its driver. For a person with a normal immune system, their system will combat the candidiasis resulting in signs of an infection. For me, it is different. Due to the changes in 1995, my system does not react. However, the pituitary does. Candidiasis produces salts, which my pituitary is trying to control. Therein lies a secondary immune response.

The following is basically something posited in the original article I read back in 1995. In my condition, because the system is forced to allow the candidiasis into the cells due to net charges/pH forcing the candidiasis out of the extracellular space, the body stops defending against it. To make a long story short, this gives the candiasis no reason to rush. It has a living body of energy creation. At that point it knows it doesn't have to fight a battle against a fully active immune system as the T-Cells suddenly give it a pass. Instead, it just has to avoid the pH issue and other immune responses. It really just wants to survive the longest period of time it can while losing as little ATP from the system as possible. Basically, an irreversible and progressive reaction which shows extreme adaptation by the candidiasis to the host including the ability to cause a chain-reaction of specific hormonal and circulatory changes designed to guarantee the desired outcome.

Attacking immediately and causing rapid tissue necrosis would waste the potential energy. The host can continually access and produce more ATP than the sum of its parts. The candidiasis realizes this is a willing host and adapts. Why bite the hand that feeds? Instead, it finds the longest, most complete method of pulling every bit of ATP out of the system. Only when all the ATP is used up will it be done. Because, make no mistake, an organism that is hundreds of millions of years old is designed to survive for as long as it can with maximum efficiency.

The problem is simply it's iatrogenic. The human body doesn't naturally give a pass to candidiasis, especially not halfway through a life. This would likely be a genetic factor if it ever naturally occurred. So, you would see problems from birth. Not only that but in this case the infection is fully involved and then suddenly the pass is given.

But, I find it fascinating that candida has evolved to take such full advantage of the situation. The cascading reaction over decades that this condition has, inevitably resulting in every cell being apoptified and leaving the subject with a belly full of food, that predictable and inevitable sequence of events is not something that candidiasis just happens into. No, this would imply, to me at least, that there was a time when the immune system operated this way more commonly. A one-in-a-million set of circumstances would not appear often enough for such an adaptation to take place. Therefore, some other mammal or perhaps some early homosapiens had an identical set of biological triggers. And candidiasis remembers, essentially having AI, storing that successful pattern and recognizing when it was time to reimplement it. It makes sense to me that given a much shorter average lifespan, there are inherent advantages to this relationship between candidiasis and its host. The condition prevents dehydration systems, and creates a sharper focus and faster reflexes. The Rube-Goldberg-like cascade over years just isn't something that I think happens randomly. The article really portrayed it as a battle between candidiasis and the pituitary/body/immune system where the fungus just plays the long game to eventually take over ever cell.

Hey, I know this is heavy. It's out there and depressing and anthropomorphizing a fungus. But, I can think what I want to think and, honestly, this condition either makes me a lot smarter or makes me think I'm a lot smarter. Because I can see the linkages in all of it, from the phases I've gone through to the crazy biochemical, hormonal, and circulatory changes that the condition causes.

The way my brain works, I'm simply fascinated by the whole thing because no one can even appear to grasp it besides me. It is literally like I have found some new unheard-of science. It basically sounds impossible to them. Yet, here I am as proof. Don't get me wrong, I would rather be wrong about everything and perfectly healthy, but every passing day makes it more obvious that I'm not wrong. So, that kinda makes it new science. The only problem with that is that it's not new. It was documented. I read it. And now it's lost. Pre-digital and hidden for some reason. Excluded from digital records. Someone had studied it. Someone had written that article which had to have been based on real experiments. And that person was an expert and didn't want their work online? Didn't think science needed to know those things. I think not. They wanted it known. But somehow it has not entered digital knowledge. You have to ask yourself why.

Literally, in the article, it discussed the potential had been considered for enhancing soldiers due to various things that occur during the course of the illness, for example where hydration risks and other possible weaknesses are lessened while the mind is sharpened. I think that's one reason why it is not found online. Very tinfoil hat of me, I know. But, I know what I read, I know what I lived, I know it all happened. Science would not easily let go of such unique long-term changes that could be imposed on humans. Scientists study other scientists. That's basically well more than half of science. Completely altering hormonal balances, biochemistries, and circulation all with a one time treatment... That would be too fascinating to ignore unless it were ignored on purpose.