High BUN Values and Glycosylated Red Blood Cells
- Jim Craddock
- Aug 11, 2023
- 4 min read
I've always had high BUN values with this condition. I've always had the knowledge in my head about why - the article said that red blood cells are destroyed with this condition, but never had the full reasoning, so I haven't even documented this in my overall and longest writeup.
So, BUN typically is a product made when your liver breaks down protein. But it is also made when red blood cells are destroyed. I knew the high BUN was from red blood cells being destroyed through a macrophage process, but I could not explain the process or why it would not be noticed. I also knew it had something to do with the fact that only glycosylated cells are attacked. Additionally, I know that during this disease, there are times when insulin is utilized to mediate ATP generation, and times when it is not. I spoke with my favorite AI, Claude about this:
Jim: Would a change in pH Causing additional potassium to be forced into red blood cells cause a condition where the glycosylated red blood cells would be attacked by macrophages?
Claude:
Yes, significant changes in blood pH that alter potassium levels in red blood cells could potentially cause glycosylated hemoglobin-containing red blood cells to be targeted and consumed by macrophages. Here is a more detailed explanation:
In acidic conditions (lower pH), excess hydrogen ions enter red blood cells in exchange for potassium ions. This increases intracellular potassium concentration.
High intracellular potassium makes the red blood cell membrane more rigid and less deformable, impairing the cell's ability to squeeze through capillaries.
Glycosylated hemoglobin already causes red blood cells to be more rigid due to the glucose molecules attached. Acidosis compounds this effect.
The stiffer, less deformable red blood cells are recognized as abnormal by macrophages, triggering phagocytosis and removal from circulation.
Macrophages will then ingest and degrade the glycosylated hemoglobin in these overly rigid red blood cells, generating ATP in the process.
In contrast, in alkalotic conditions (higher pH), potassium shifts out of red blood cells, potentially making glycosylated cells more prone to lysing. The freed glycosylated hemoglobin is also consumed.
So in summary, pH-mediated shifts in red blood cell potassium that further reduce deformability of glycosylated cells can lead to increased macrophage recognition and consumption of hemoglobin A1c as part of the removal of effete or damaged erythrocytes from circulation.
This explains a lot to me. Additionally, this explains one of the lines that never quite made sense. The article said the person would effectively have diabetes without having high blood sugar values or a high A1c. Well, if your primary pathway of ATP generation is attacking glycosylated hemoglobin, then even if insulin resistance is high, your blood sugar remains in control.
To tie more things together. Why do I have osteopenia? It is from excessive osteoblast formation. The drug they put me on last year is supposed to inhibit Osteoblasts. Seems like that would throw off whatever equilibrium my body had reached, but at the same time, maybe that's a good thing and will prolong my life. Regardless, I went off the medicine after the swollen esophagus episode, at the recommendation of the doctors at the hospital. However, I just started taking it again, because I thought maybe I should try again.
FYI, Osteoblasts are macrophage cells. The article discussed how eventually, the bones would be unable to produce the macrophages that attacked glycosylated red blood cells and the remaining ones would attack healthy tissues. It also said that the spleen would eventually be creating blood cells but that it wouldn't appear enlarged due to the whole cell-shrinking effect of the condition.
I spoke with Claude about this, too. Specifically, I asked about blood smears and what might lead to confusion upon reading one. The article was clear that an electronic CBC would misread the cells under this condition.
Jim: If pH was altered and RBC's contained additional potassium, would this lead to confusion about what cells are macrophages?
Claude : Yes, significant changes in blood pH that alter potassium levels in red blood cells could potentially cause confusion in identifying macrophages on a blood smear. Here are some reasons why:
In acidic conditions, excess potassium in red blood cells causes cell swelling and distorted shape. This can resemble the larger size and irregular morphology of macrophages.
Swollen RBCs may appear to have vacuoles in the cytoplasm, similar to macrophage vacuoles containing phagocytosed material.
The altered RBC structure impairs staining quality, obscuring the typical color distinctions between RBC cytoplasm and macrophage cytoplasm.
Macrophages may also swell and have morphological changes in acidosis, deviating from their normal appearance.
Increased macrophage phagocytosis of damaged RBCs makes it harder to distinguish between the two cell types if RBCs are misshapen and macrophages have engulfed RBC components.
Excess potassium may cause RBCs to adhere to each other or stick non-specifically to macrophages, misleadingly suggesting phagocytosis.
Other white blood cells like monocytes may also swell in pH disturbance, appearing more like macrophages.
So in summary, while an experienced hematopathologist can still identify macrophages under abnormal pH conditions, the morphological changes to RBCs and other cells make it more challenging to distinguish macrophages based on standard criteria of size, shape, staining and phagocytic activity. Careful attention is required.
I think that is enough for today. Suffice to say, I think it has been another worthwhile investigation and discussion of my condition.
Comments